Banner
Technology Due Diligence – Series Introduction
This is my site Written by Alexander on February 12, 2009 – 18:18

Series Introduction:

The Technology Due Diligence – Series Introduction is the first posting of an ongoing series on performing Information Technology (IT)  due diligence.  In this first section, we provide a brief commentary of the purposes and principles of conducting an IT due diligence, and layout the foundation and structure of the series.

 

Technology Due Diligence:

 

Information Technology due diligence efforts commonly fall into several traps.  The findings aren’t relative to the transaction strategy, or aren’t objective or thorough enough to be effective.  Worst of all, IT due diligence sometimes is not done at all, leaving dealmakers and corporate governance alike liable for unforeseen financial exposure, and stockholder retribution from any resulting negative impact to post-merger valuation.

 

Avoiding these traps requires following a basic due diligence success criteria. Fundamentally, any merger, acquisition, or divestiture due diligence is intended to reduce buyer exposure (or seller in the event of a divestiture), and contribute to the opportunity by providing a basis for business executives to make informed decisions.  For technology practitioners, meeting these criteria requires performing a rapid, fact-based analysis that is appropriately aligned to the business strategy behind the transaction.

 

Throughout this series, we demonstrate how to perform an analysis to support business transactions while avoiding common post-merger issues. The context is designed to straddle the line between technology analysis and business strategy, giving both business and technology professionals a holistic picture of technology’s impact on negotiations and post-merger valuation.

 

The series is initially structured around the 4 distinct Beacon Integration (BI) models of IT due diligence. There are 2 models for M&A, and 2 models for divestitures, all designed to produce transaction relevant results.  

 

BI Models:

 

  • Current State Evaluation
  • Forward Looking Due Diligence
  • Buy-Side Divestiture Due Diligence
  • Sell-Side Divestiture Due Diligence

 

In each section, we will outline how the principle of each BI model is based on producing objective/quantifiable results that can be provided quickly, without compromising valuable insight. The models leverage a combination of best practice tools ranging from ISO, through Six Sigma, to COBIT, adopting attributes from each that can fit within the tight working constraints of a due diligence. 

 

We continue the series by providing ongoing commentary on how to perform an IT due diligence under different circumstance, such as evaluating innovative technology and applying due diligence techniques in a turnaround situation. Both of which requires introducing different analysis and valuation methods.

 

Technology Due Diligence – Series Index:

 

Readers, be sure to bookmark this page, as it can be used as a menu to jump to major sections that they are interested in. We will activate the hyperlinks below of upcoming sections, as the posts become available, so stay tuned!

 

  • Type II – the Forward Looking Due Diligence
  • Type III – Buy-Side Divestiture Due Diligence
  • Type IV – Sell-Side Divestiture Due Diligence
  • Innovative Technology Evaluation
  • Distressed Analysis Techniques 
  • Legal Requirements for Performing IT Due Diligence
  • The Due Diligence Questioner (including a template download)
  • Using the Due Diligence to Achieving Post-Merger Success

 

Please note: To gain the most value from each post, it is recommended to read the posts sequentially, as it is common for posts to reference earlier work. However, a reader will be able to grasp basic subject specific concepts if reading a post individually.

 

Continue to part 1 of our ongoing series on Technology Due Diligence, Two Approaches to M&A IT Due Diligence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 Responses »

  1. Great topic area! I have done 30 plus transactions and I know that the technology due diligence is lacking in almost every deal. The problem as you have correctly placed it is that usually the engineers asked to look over the technology do not have a strong enough business side and the business people do not understand the technology.

  2. I’m in post merger restructuring too. I’m looking forward to reading your post on buy side divesture due diligence. I’m working on a carve-out of a financial services / wealth management division that my company acquired and it’s more technically complex than we anticipated . When do you expect to publish the divestiture process postings?

  3. So, what your basically saying is that my IT department, which concentrates on running my network and servers, really has no idea how to evaluate anther organization’s IT during a due diligence because they really don’t grasp the business concepts behind my divestiture strategy. I can buy that. My IT team is great once we can convey our business strategy to them, but it takes a lot of effort to get us there.

  4. Hi there, I was looking around for a while searching for cobit download and I happened upon this site and your post regarding Technology Due Diligence – Series Introduction, I will definitely add this site to my cobit download bookmarks!

Leave a Reply